Special Education process and Advocacy FAQs
Special Education Process
My child had a private evaluation and was given a diagnosis. The evaluator recommended a 504 plan or an IEP. How do I get a 504 plan or an IEP?
You should share the evaluation with the appropriate point person in the school and request an initial eligibility process for a 504 plan or an IEP. You can send an email that should communicate that you are referring your child for an initial evaluation to determine eligibility for an IEP or 504 plan, whichever applies. You should indicate that the attached neuropsychological evaluation you are sharing is a part of that process.
Most likely, at this point the district will propose their own evaluations. In this case, if you are referring for an IEP, you should receive a consent form within five school working days of your initial request. You have some options on how to respond to the consent form. You can simply accept what the school is proposing, you can ask for additional evaluations in the area of suspected disability, or you can decline some or all of the evaluations the district has proposed. How you respond is a decision that has to be made strategically.
The district will conduct the evaluations and convene a team meeting to discuss the results and establish initial eligibility for an IEP or a 504 plan. For an IEP, IDEA specifies the roles of professionals who should be present in the team meeting. For a 504 plan, the team will be much smaller, consisting of people knowledgeable about the child, evaluation information, and placement options. Specific roles are not specified.
In MA, for an IEP eligibility evaluation, the district has 30 school working days from the day it receives consent to conduct the evaluations and 45 school working days from the day it receives consent to hold the meeting. For a 504 plan, there are no evaluation time frames. Many districts choose to follow the same timeframes associated with the IEP process, although this is not a requirement.
You are entitled to request copies of the assessment summaries to be provided to you at least two days prior to the meeting to discuss them. Remember to check the appropriate box on the consent form.
If the district declines to conduct the evaluation, it has to send you a formal written notice stating the reasons. At this point, you can choose to take further procedural steps.
The district is mandated to consider the outside report, but the district is not mandated to accept its findings, including any diagnosis and recommendations.
Do I need an advocate for this process?
It can be beneficial to get an advocate involved early, so that from the very beginning, you and your child are in the best possible position, especially in such an important process as determination of eligibility. A well-rounded advocate who has educational, clinical, and legal training for advocates can help make sure that your child is evaluated in all the relevant areas. This will give you the most information based on which eligibility can be established and a comprehensive IEP or 504 plan can be developed.
I don't get any information from the school about how my child, who has an IEP, is doing. How do I ask the school for it, and do they have to provide it?
School is sending me progress reports, but there is no data. Is that OK?
Yes, the school is mandated to send you information about your child's progress at least as often as progress data is sent out for general education students. In current practice, this means that you will receive at least two progress reports during the school year.
These progress reports should contain data. The data should be relevant to each objective on your child's IEP. Reports that state vaguely that "the student is making steady progress" or "the student is working very hard on these skills" but do not contain hard data that corresponds to how an objective conceptualizes progress, are inadequate.
The school should also have other data, but they might not share it with parents. Receiving good quality data is crucial for monitoring your child's progress. While you might hear from the team that your child is doing great, the law requires that special education decisions are made based on data and not solely on anecdotal reports.
If you are not receiving the data you are looking for from the district, or you do not have information on what your child is working on in school, you can request this from your team. You should know exactly what you are looking for to discuss how it can be shared. Your child's daily experiences can be a part of a home-school communication process, which can be documented as an accommodation on your child's IEP.
Parents can often benefit from the assistance of a professional to make sure that data collection is set up in a way that allows progress monitoring. An advocate can make sure that the appropriate data is being collected and regularly shared with parents.
My child has an IEP, but I think that it is not good enough. The annual review meeting is in many months. What can I do?
In MA, parents do not need to wait for an annual review meeting to make changes to an IEP. You can request an IEP meeting at any time, and the team will convene within a reasonable time. There is no specified legal timeframe for how quickly the team needs to meet. If the district declines convening a team meeting, it should send you a formal written notice.
To request a meeting, write to your IEP team chair and state that you have new concerns to discuss with the team and would like to request a meeting.
In this meeting, your concerns should be heard and considered by the team. It is also a good practice for the team members to give you updates on how your child is doing. It often helps to have an idea of what changes you would like for the IEP before going into this meeting. You can then share these ideas with the team and the team can consider them. Team members are likely to have their own ideas as well, and they should also be considered.
Make sure to take note of all the agreements that have been made. In MA, parents should also receive a copy of the team meeting summary. At minimum, the summary must include the proposed service-delivery grid and the major goal areas. Parents initial the summary to indicate that it reflects what has been discussed. The initials do not indicate your agreement with the team's decisions. When meetings are virtual, the summary is usually sent to you by email. If you disagree with the documentation, you should email the team chair to express your concerns about any inaccuracies.
Do I need an advocate for this process?
Whether or not you want an advocate to come with you to this meeting is a personal decision. An advocate who has appropriate training can provide in-depth recommendations on the needed IEP changes. An advocate can also let you know what the school is mandated to provide for your child. In my professional experience, schools tend not to share this information with parents. This allows a discussion of a much more comprehensive IEP that supports your child in learning skills and accessing academics and social life of school.
IEP, its Content, and its Implementation
I have an IEP meeting coming up, but I don't know what to ask. Who can help me figure it out?
You are not alone in not knowing what your child should have on the IEP. As much as you know and love your child, putting that into specific IEP asks is tricky. Most parents do not know what support options the schools have, and schools do not usually offer parents that information. So school is a bit like a black box -- parents often do not know what is available, or even what is happening.
There is not one specific professional who can help figure out what should be on your child's IEP. Most immediately, a professional with educational, clinical, and developmental training who is also familiar with how special education works can provide input. Over the long-term, if there are lingering questions about diagnosis, appropriate classroom placement, or needed services, it can be helpful to obtain a neuropsychological evaluation to get an in-depth assessment and specific educational recommendations from a highly trained private expert.
My child on an IEP is refusing to do any work in school. What do I do? Who can help me?
My child on an IEP is having frequent meltdowns and behavioral problems/outbursts in school and I am asked to pick them up all the time. What do I do? Who can help me?
You need someone who has training to figure out why your child is responding to school in this way. This has to be a professional who has clinical, educational, and developmental training. This person has to be able to understand your child's strengths and needs. This professional also needs to be able to figure out what is happening in the classroom that is leading to your child struggling to engage in learning or struggling to self-regulate.
Examples of professionals can include advocates who have special education and clinical expertise, clinical psychologists, school psychologists, and neuropsychologists.
Some of the tools that can help understand a struggling student's situation include additional data collection, conducting a Functional Behavioral Assessment, updating the Behavioral Support Plan to provide better proactive adjustments and accommodations, and convening the team to review the appropriateness of the IEP.
If your child's behaviors resulted in multiple suspensions, disciplinary removals, and other disciplinary actions against your child, the best professionals to assist are an advocate or an attorney.
My child has been on an IEP for years, but I don't see any progress. Who can help?
When your child has not made progress in school for a long time, you need a professional who is able to make sense of all the information and data about your child that has been accumulated over the years. What services has your child been receiving, and how often? What methodologies have been used? What skills has your child been working on? What progress data is available, and what does it show? And the most important question: given all of this, what is in the way of your child's progress and how do we fix it?
Often, answering these questions will involve asking the school for the data they have not previously shared. Many schools do not routinely share Behavioral Support Plans, which can also be requested. Sometimes, a school observation or additional evaluations are needed in order to answer these questions. A neuropsychological evaluation can also be a highly valuable tool for understanding lack of progress and identifying all the possible ways to change that.
Once it is established what needs to change, an IEP team meeting has to be convened and the needed changes have to be discussed with the team. If the process of clarifying what needs to be done takes time, more than one team meeting can be convened to review new information as it becomes available.
For this situation, you need a professional who has a strong background in education, disability, or child development. If you hire an advocate for this situation, the advocate should have the right training, or should collaborate with additional professionals who can add expertise.
I want someone to go to the school and see how my child is doing in the classroom, to conduct a school observation. Who can do that?
Having a professional go into the school to observe your child is a great tool for many purposes. Some examples include:
-
If you are wondering how the IEP is actually being implemented and if your child is getting all the accommodations on the IEP.
-
If you are hearing from the team that your child is doing great, but you are not seeing much progress.
-
If your child strongly dislikes school, or comes home exhausted and falls apart behaviorally or emotionally.
-
If you are looking for the district to outplace your child into a private school and have the district pay for it. In this case, although not legally mandatory, an observation is an important part of the process.
In Massachusetts, there are legal requirements for the school districts to ensure observer access. This makes it easier to arrange for an observation.
Who the specific professional is who will conduct the observation depends on its purposes and also on the circumstances. This is better discussed with a professional who is experienced with the special education process and who can advise on the best time for it and the best professional to help you.
Many times, it is better to take other steps before doing the observation in order to maximize its usefulness.
If your family and your child are struggling with any of the above challenges, I am happy to discuss your specific situation with you. I provide a full range of advocacy services, including school observations. You can read more about my background and approach on my Special Education Advocacy and School Observations pages. If you would like, please email me for a free introductory call.
Choosing the Right Professional to Help You
I want the district to pay for a private school OR I want private placement for my child. Who can help me?
The process of placing your child on an IEP into a specialized private school at the public school district's expense, called an "outplacement," is very technical and often lengthy.
You have to be strategic about building your case, which involves taking steps to help you meet the burden of proof requirement for outplacement. There are multiple factors that dictate what steps you take, at what time, and in what order. What is important is to build the best case for your desired outcome.
While an attorney's involvement and guidance are often needed at some point, most of the time the first steps in the process can be taken with the less costly assistance of an experienced advocate. An experienced advocate can review your case and explain what specific steps are needed, and whether there is a role for an advocate to support you or whether your case requires the help of an attorney immediately.
There are also some cases in which an advocate can succeed in accomplishing the outplacement without any attorney's involvement. This outcome can never be guaranteed, but with the right tools it can sometimes be possible. An experienced advocate will know how much they can do on their own, and at which point an attorney referral is needed.
I am having a disagreement with a school. Do I need an advocate or an attorney?
There are no hard and fast rules, but generally, if you are having a disagreement with the school, it is often enough to hire an advocate. Advocates and attorneys have different tools that they use in their work.
An advocate can resolve many disagreements with a school at a lower cost than an attorney would. However, many situations call for an attorney advising an advocate behind the scenes or being directly involved. An experienced advocate will let you know when advocacy tools are not sufficient for accomplishing the outcome you want, and an attorney should get involved. If you choose to hire an advocate, make sure that they are able to determine when their expertise is not the best match for your needs.
Many advocates and attorneys offer free introductory calls. If you are unsure of which way to go, contacting different professionals for their input might help you make that decision.
How do I find the best advocate? There are so many.
The best advocate for your family and child comes down to the training that the advocate needs to have for your case, their style, and how you feel communicating with them.
Because you are trusting the advocate to work on issues that are so important and emotional for your family, feeling comfortable with them on a personal level is very important. Is the advocate communicating clearly with you? Does the advocate listen to your concerns and ideas? Are they being transparent? Do they inform you of all the options and help you to make informed decisions? Are they explaining the special education process to you, so over time you can become more knowledgeable and confident in dealing with your child's IEP?
Advocates approach their work differently. Some are collaborative and respectful, while also pushing hard when needed. Some are immediately confrontational. Some dominate meetings, while others balance input with listening. Ask advocates about their approach and choose the style you are comfortable with.
In general, I think that a more collaborative advocacy style, balanced with an ability to push and persist, serves families best. Your child may spend many years in the district. You will often be working with the same people for a long time. Maintaining a good working relationship as much as possible makes advocacy easier. When trust is already ruptured, taking reasonable steps to restore it can also be useful.
Many advocates offer free introductory calls. Take advantage of those to get more information about the candidates you are considering and make an informed decision.
If I can be of assistance to you in making any of these important decisions, please do not hesitate to reach out. You can read more about my background and approach on my Special Education Advocacy and About Yulika pages. If you would like, please email me for a free 15-minute introductory call.
Role of AI
Can I use an AI Agent (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) to help me advocate instead of using an advocate or an attorney?
The field of Artificial Intelligence is developing quickly. Many of my clients rely on AI for advice on how to approach their special education issues, or to tell them what their children need.
I think that in the context of special education, AI can be very helpful in organizing, summarizing, and comparing long documents. It can also be helpful in providing legal information, such as what the law requires, time frames, legal precedent, etc. It can assist in writing emails and other communications to the district that have good organization, clarity, and an appropriate tone.
However, AI can also provide inaccurate information and feedback. For example, I used AI to review this entire FAQ page, which I wrote myself, for accuracy. The AI agent initially flagged two instances of what it stated to be inaccurate legal information. However, when instructed to conduct further research, the AI agent reported back that my writing was indeed correct and its feedback was incorrect. The AI Agent informed me that until directed to the correct sources, it used a range of sources that was too narrow. This tendency of AI to confidently report inaccurate information is reflected in The NIST Generative AI Risk Management Profile. AI can invent legal cases, quote outdated law, or confuse state and federal requirements. It is prudent to verify AI recommendations against primary sources or have them reviewed by a professional.
I would also expect AI to be great at pulling out data and summarizing data trends, such as progress over the years, but in my experience AI makes mistakes while doing this work. This is especially true when documents being analyzed, such as progress reports, contain vague writing or are presented in non-standardized formats. AI additionally does not evaluate statements such as "Objective met" against pieces of data that are not contained in the same chunk of text. As a result, AI can assume that an objective has been met even when there is no data supporting the statement. Double checking the accuracy of AI analysis of educational data is always necessary.***
Where, in my experience, AI is not useful is in making educational and clinical recommendations that are specific to the child's profile. As an AI Agent informed me, "AI has access to patterns and frameworks used in clinical reasoning, but it cannot substitute for direct assessment, contextual knowledge, verification, or accountable professional judgment."
Finally, unlike human advocates and attorneys, it has never worked in your child's district. AI does not know the district's specific culture, what programs are available, and how helpful the Special Education Director is going to be. AI can suggest strategies, but is unable to know if they are appropriate in your specific district or in your child's specific cicumstances.
Importantly, AI presents a significant privacy concern. It is not advisable to upload educational records, such as IEPs, evaluations, and progress reports into an AI platform without fully removing all identifiable personal information from the documents.
To summarize, I think that AI is a great tool that can assist with many tasks required for special education advocacy. However, at the present moment, its skills are not up to the task of taking over the roles of advocates and attorneys.
***
I also note that my use of AI for progress monitoring is limited to clients who provide explicit written consent for me to do so. I use a HIPAA-compliant AI agent. Parents acknowledge potential risks of AI use if they agree to this work. They are also free to decline use of AI in their child's case.